Trading forex & CFDs is high risk and can result in the loss of all your capital. Only trade with money you can afford to lose. Not investment advice.

Top 5 Best Lionheart Funding Alternatives for Online Traders (2026 Guide)

Lionheart Funding alternatives are needed because both of its domains are now dead: lionheartfunding.com redirects to a GoDaddy for-sale listing and lionheartfundingprogram.com returns an upstream failure. The best Lionheart Funding alternative is FTMO, the highest-rated firm in the same category that is still trading.

2026 Alternatives Guide

Lionheart Funding should be treated as closed rather than paused. lionheartfunding.com now redirects to a GoDaddy for-sale listing, and the brand domain, lionheartfundingprogram.com, returns an upstream failure. The UAE firm had already paused after the MetaTrader crackdown on prop firms. These are 5 firms still trading.

Why are traders leaving Lionheart Funding?

This one went quiet rather than announcing anything, which is why the domains matter more than the statements.

Both domains are now dead

lionheartfunding.com redirects to a GoDaddy for-sale page — the domain is being sold — and lionheartfundingprogram.com returns “upstream request failed”. Our review found the second one behind a security check in September; it is worse now. Checked 12 October 2026.

It paused after the MetaTrader crackdown

The firm paused its service following MetaQuotes action against prop firms. A firm whose whole product depends on one platform licence has a single point of failure, and this is what that looks like.

Traffic collapsed before the silence

The tracker Prop Firm Pal recorded traffic falling from roughly 10,180 visits in June to 552 in August, then no connection at all from mid-September. That pattern usually precedes a wind-down.

Nobody announced anything

There has been no closure statement. Our review has taken down the challenge prices it used to quote, because they were estimates the firm never published — so there is no reliable figure left to compare against.

How do Lionheart Funding alternatives compare in 2026?

Firm Type, trading since Cheapest entry Platforms Best for / status
Lionheart Funding (leaving) Forex prop, UAE — MT5 Both domains dead; one is for sale
FTMO Forex/CFD prop, 2015 $10k from EUR 79 on the 1-Step MT4, MT5, cTrader MT4, MT5 and cTrader; owns its broker
The5ers Forex prop, 2016 $2,500 High Stakes Classic at $19 MT5, cTrader, TradingView MT5, cTrader and TradingView
FXIFY Forex/CFD prop, 2023 $100k Lightning from $399 MT5, DXtrade, TradingView MT5, DXtrade and TradingView
BrightFunded Multi-asset prop, Dubai, 2023 $100k 2-Step Classic at EUR 497 MT5, cTrader, DXtrade MT5, cTrader and DXtrade included
FunderPro CFD and futures prop, 2023 $100k Classic at $539 MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker MT5, cTrader and TradeLocker

Which are the best Lionheart Funding alternatives?

FTMO

★ 4.8/5 our rating · Trading since 2015

FTMO is the most established firm in the category and the one most of our closed-firm pages point at. The two Czech companies behind it, FTMO s.r.o. (business ID 031 36 752) and FTMO Evaluation Global s.r.o. (092 13 651), are both registered at Purkynova 2121/3 in Prague and can be looked up.

Pros
  • Trading since 2015 under one name; Trustpilot 4.8 from 52.7K reviews, 92% five-star (read 23 Sep 2026)
  • Named companies and business IDs on a public register
  • FTMO Group owns the broker OANDA, so it is not renting its execution from anyone
  • No time limit on either evaluation; the 2-Step fee is refunded with your first reward
Cons
  • The 1-Step maximum loss trails your highest end-of-day balance
  • A Best Day rule caps your single best day at 50% of total positive-day profit on the 1-Step
  • The 2-Step needs at least 4 trading days in each phase
Why it beats Lionheart Funding: Lionheart depended on one platform licence and stopped when that licence came under pressure. FTMO runs MT4, MT5 and cTrader and owns its own broker.

Start with FTMO →

The5ers

★ 4.7/5 our rating · Trading since 2016

The5ers has funded traders from Israel since 2016 and is the cheapest way back in after losing an account: a $2,500 High Stakes Classic two-step evaluation costs $19, with the fee refunded on the funded account. Drawdown is static rather than trailing.

Pros
  • Funding traders under one name since 2016
  • Trustpilot 4.7 from 37,586 reviews (read 16 Sep 2026) — a live, unsuspended profile
  • $19 entry on the $2,500 High Stakes Classic; 10% back in hub credits after Step 1, 20% after Step 2, then a withdrawable refund on the funded account
  • Static drawdown; splits open at 80% and scale to 100%, with accounts to $4,000,000 on Hyper Growth
Cons
  • Withdrawals can only be requested every two weeks, first request 14 days after funding
  • 100% sits only at the top of the scaling ladder
  • The 3-Step Bootcamp is charged twice, on entry and again on passing
Why it beats Lionheart Funding: MT5, cTrader and TradingView, so no single platform decision can take the account away from you.

Try The5ers →

FXIFY

★ 4.4/5 our rating · Trading since 2023

FXIFY is broker-backed and sits inside an established FX group, so its liquidity and its payout capacity come from the same place. Accounts run $5,000 to $400,000 with splits to 90%, and the first payout is on demand from $50 rather than on a fixed cycle.

Pros
  • Broker-backed by a group with its own liquidity, not a reseller layer
  • On-demand first payout from $50, then bi-weekly
  • Trustpilot 4.3 from 6,281 reviews, rated Great (read 24 Sep 2026)
  • One, two and three-phase routes plus the Lightning 1-step; a 100% refund is advertised, so check the trigger on the plan you buy
Cons
  • Founded 2023, so the payout record is short next to FTMO or The5ers
  • Drawdown limits and consistency rules differ by plan, so read the one you buy
  • Lower-rated reviews cluster around price-feed disputes
Why it beats Lionheart Funding: MT5, DXtrade and TradingView, inside a broker group — the opposite of a firm that paused when its platform supplier moved.

Try FXIFY →

BrightFunded

★ 4.3/5 our rating · Dubai, founded 2023

BrightFunded pays 80% by default, rising to 90% after the first scale-up, and settles approved payouts within 24 hours. Its 2-Step accounts use a static drawdown, so profits do not drag the loss limit upward, and no program carries a consistency rule.

Pros
  • 80% split by default and 90% after the first scale-up; 100% only after a third scale-up, which takes twelve months at minimum
  • Approved payouts settled within 24 hours by USDC or bank transfer; the cycle is bi-weekly, with the first request 30 days after your first funded trade
  • Static drawdown on the 2-Step plans — 8% on Bright, 10% on Classic — and no consistency rule on any program, on MT5, cTrader and DXtrade
  • Named Dubai HQ with hubs in Amsterdam and Warsaw
Cons
  • Trustpilot has suppressed its public score over a guidelines breach tied to removed fake reviews
  • Its own published figures move around: five different lifetime payout totals inside twelve months, and two different active-trader counts on the same panel
  • Founded 2023, so there is little long-run payout history
  • Several 1-star reviews cite account breaches for hedging — keep strategies single-account
Why it beats Lionheart Funding: MT5, cTrader and DXtrade at no extra platform cost, from a firm that publishes where it is based.

Try BrightFunded →

FunderPro

★ 4.2/5 our rating · Malta, trading since 2023

FunderPro runs a one-phase evaluation with a three-day minimum and no time limit, scaling to $5 million. FunderPro Ltd is registered in Malta, company number C 104558, while the simulated trading service itself is provided by FunderPro Saint Lucia Ltd.

Pros
  • One-phase evaluation with a three-day minimum and no time limit
  • Scales to $5,000,000
  • FunderPro Ltd is registered in Malta, company number C 104558
  • Zero commission, $0 per lot, across instruments on TradeLocker and cTrader
Cons
  • The entity that actually provides the simulated trading sits in Saint Lucia, not the Malta company whose registration number is advertised
  • Founded 2023, so there is little long-run payout history
  • 80% split by default; 90% only with a paid upgrade
Why it beats Lionheart Funding: MT5, cTrader and TradeLocker, with a named Maltese entity rather than a domain listed for sale.

Try FunderPro →

What is the best alternative to Lionheart Funding in 2026?

FTMO is the firm our own Lionheart page names: the highest-rated firm in the same category that is trading today and whose terms we have been able to check. Every alternative here runs at least three platforms, which is the specific thing Lionheart did not.

The lesson from Lionheart Funding is platform concentration. A prop firm that can only execute on one platform is one supplier decision away from pausing, and a pause with no announcement is indistinguishable from a closure. Favour firms running three or more platforms. See our full best prop firms ranking.

What else should traders ask about Lionheart Funding alternatives?

Is Lionheart Funding closed?

Treat it as closed. lionheartfunding.com redirects to a GoDaddy for-sale listing and lionheartfundingprogram.com returns an upstream failure, checked 12 October 2026. No closure was ever announced.

Why did Lionheart Funding pause?

It paused following the MetaQuotes crackdown on prop firms using MetaTrader. Its service never resumed, and both of its domains have since failed.

Are the old Lionheart challenge prices still valid?

There are no reliable prices. Our review removed the figures it used to quote because they were estimates the firm never published itself.

What is the best Lionheart Funding alternative?

FTMO, which our own Lionheart page names, and which runs MT4, MT5 and cTrader so no single platform licence can stop it. The5ers, FXIFY, BrightFunded and FunderPro are also covered here.

I have an open Lionheart account — what now?

There is no working site or support channel to reach. Keep every record of your balance and correspondence, and ask your payment provider about a chargeback if you paid by card.

How do I avoid a firm pausing like this?

Check how many platforms it runs. A firm on one platform licence has one point of failure; a firm on three can lose one and keep trading.

Affiliate disclosure: this page contains affiliate links and top30forexbrokers.com may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Prop-firm evaluations involve simulated capital and carry risk; most participants do not pass. This is information, not investment advice.

🔗 Affiliate Disclosure

This site contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission when you sign up through them, at no extra cost to you. Trading is high risk — most retail traders lose money. Nothing here is investment advice.