Trading forex & CFDs is high risk and can result in the loss of all your capital. Only trade with money you can afford to lose. Not investment advice.

Top 5 Best Nova Funding Alternatives for Online Traders (2026 Guide)

Nova Funding alternatives are needed because Nova Funding was suspended in 2024 and nova-funding.com no longer belongs to the firm, now redirecting to an unrelated hospitality business. It holds 2.2 on Trustpilot from 4,468 reviews. The best Nova Funding alternative is FTMO.

2026 Alternatives Guide

Nova Funding was suspended in 2024 and never came back. Its domain has since lapsed and been picked up by someone else — type nova-funding.com today and you land on a French restaurant. It carries 2.2 on Trustpilot from 4,468 reviews. These are the 5 firms we would use instead.

Why are traders leaving Nova Funding?

Nova Funding is the clearest case on this site of a firm whose reviews told you what was coming.

Suspended in 2024 and never resumed

The firm was suspended in 2024 and we have found no closure announcement from it since. Treat it as a firm that can no longer be verified rather than one that formally wound up — but do not send it money.

The domain has changed hands

nova-funding.com, the address our own link used, now redirects to lafeuilledevigne2300.com, an unrelated hospitality business. Its app subdomain no longer resolves at all, and novafunding.com belongs to an unrelated legal-funding company in the United States. Checked 12 October 2026.

2.2 on Trustpilot from 4,468 reviews

That is the lowest score of any firm covered on this site, across a large enough sample to be meaningful, and it is dominated by payout-delay and support complaints.

A high-frequency bot challenge-passing scheme

Our review records that the firm operated a scheme to pass challenges using high-frequency bots. A firm doing that is not running an evaluation; it is running something else.

How do Nova Funding alternatives compare in 2026?

Firm Type, trading since Cheapest entry Platforms Best for / status
Nova Funding (leaving) Forex prop — — Suspended 2024; domain now a restaurant site
FTMO Forex/CFD prop, 2015 $10k from EUR 79 on the 1-Step MT4, MT5, cTrader Same domain, paying for a decade
The5ers Forex prop, 2016 $2,500 High Stakes Classic at $19 MT5, cTrader, TradingView 4.7 from 37,586 reviews
Instant Funding No-evaluation CFD prop, UK, 2021 Accounts from $625 MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader Payouts verifiable on-chain
FXIFY Forex/CFD prop, 2023 $100k Lightning from $399 MT5, DXtrade, TradingView Broker-backed; on-demand payouts
BrightFunded Multi-asset prop, Dubai, 2023 $100k 2-Step Classic at EUR 497 MT5, cTrader, DXtrade Named Dubai HQ; static drawdown

Which are the best Nova Funding alternatives?

FTMO

★ 4.8/5 our rating · Trading since 2015

FTMO is the most established firm in the category and the one most of our closed-firm pages point at. The two Czech companies behind it, FTMO s.r.o. (business ID 031 36 752) and FTMO Evaluation Global s.r.o. (092 13 651), are both registered at Purkynova 2121/3 in Prague and can be looked up.

Pros
  • Trading since 2015 under one name; Trustpilot 4.8 from 52.7K reviews, 92% five-star (read 23 Sep 2026)
  • Named companies and business IDs on a public register
  • FTMO Group owns the broker OANDA, so it is not renting its execution from anyone
  • No time limit on either evaluation; the 2-Step fee is refunded with your first reward
Cons
  • The 1-Step maximum loss trails your highest end-of-day balance
  • A Best Day rule caps your single best day at 50% of total positive-day profit on the 1-Step
  • The 2-Step needs at least 4 trading days in each phase
Why it beats Nova Funding: FTMO has held the same domain and paid traders for a decade, which is exactly what went wrong at Nova Funding.

Start with FTMO →

The5ers

★ 4.7/5 our rating · Trading since 2016

The5ers has funded traders from Israel since 2016 and is the cheapest way back in after losing an account: a $2,500 High Stakes Classic two-step evaluation costs $19, with the fee refunded on the funded account. Drawdown is static rather than trailing.

Pros
  • Funding traders under one name since 2016
  • Trustpilot 4.7 from 37,586 reviews (read 16 Sep 2026) — a live, unsuspended profile
  • $19 entry on the $2,500 High Stakes Classic; 10% back in hub credits after Step 1, 20% after Step 2, then a withdrawable refund on the funded account
  • Static drawdown; splits open at 80% and scale to 100%, with accounts to $4,000,000 on Hyper Growth
Cons
  • Withdrawals can only be requested every two weeks, first request 14 days after funding
  • 100% sits only at the top of the scaling ladder
  • The 3-Step Bootcamp is charged twice, on entry and again on passing
Why it beats Nova Funding: Trustpilot 4.7 from 37,586 reviews against 2.2 from 4,468. Both samples are large; the difference is the firm.

Try The5ers →

Instant Funding

★ 4.4/5 our rating · UK, established 2021

Instant Funding is a UK no-evaluation prop firm: you buy a funded CFD account outright, with no challenge phase. It is the only firm on this page whose payouts you can verify yourself, because they go out on-chain and are visible on Tronscan, Arbiscan and Etherscan.

Pros
  • Payouts published on-chain and independently verifiable on Tronscan, Arbiscan and Etherscan
  • Cumulative payouts published with a yearly breakdown: $21,406,106+ since 2023
  • No evaluation at all; accounts $625 to $120K, scaling to $1.28M
  • 85,000+ traders across 180+ countries; MT5, cTrader and Match-Trader
Cons
  • The account fee is paid up front, because there is no challenge to pass first
  • Drawdown rules apply from the first trade
  • Most programs pay 80%; the 90% and 95% tiers apply only on specific programs or longer payout timelines
Why it beats Nova Funding: Nova Funding is a payout-complaint story. Instant Funding publishes its payouts on-chain, where you can check them yourself rather than taking a number on a homepage.

Try Instant Funding →

FXIFY

★ 4.4/5 our rating · Trading since 2023

FXIFY is broker-backed and sits inside an established FX group, so its liquidity and its payout capacity come from the same place. Accounts run $5,000 to $400,000 with splits to 90%, and the first payout is on demand from $50 rather than on a fixed cycle.

Pros
  • Broker-backed by a group with its own liquidity, not a reseller layer
  • On-demand first payout from $50, then bi-weekly
  • Trustpilot 4.3 from 6,281 reviews, rated Great (read 24 Sep 2026)
  • One, two and three-phase routes plus the Lightning 1-step; a 100% refund is advertised, so check the trigger on the plan you buy
Cons
  • Founded 2023, so the payout record is short next to FTMO or The5ers
  • Drawdown limits and consistency rules differ by plan, so read the one you buy
  • Lower-rated reviews cluster around price-feed disputes
Why it beats Nova Funding: A broker group behind the firm, against one that was suspended and then let its domain lapse.

Try FXIFY →

BrightFunded

★ 4.3/5 our rating · Dubai, founded 2023

BrightFunded pays 80% by default, rising to 90% after the first scale-up, and settles approved payouts within 24 hours. Its 2-Step accounts use a static drawdown, so profits do not drag the loss limit upward, and no program carries a consistency rule.

Pros
  • 80% split by default and 90% after the first scale-up; 100% only after a third scale-up, which takes twelve months at minimum
  • Approved payouts settled within 24 hours by USDC or bank transfer; the cycle is bi-weekly, with the first request 30 days after your first funded trade
  • Static drawdown on the 2-Step plans — 8% on Bright, 10% on Classic — and no consistency rule on any program, on MT5, cTrader and DXtrade
  • Named Dubai HQ with hubs in Amsterdam and Warsaw
Cons
  • Trustpilot has suppressed its public score over a guidelines breach tied to removed fake reviews
  • Its own published figures move around: five different lifetime payout totals inside twelve months, and two different active-trader counts on the same panel
  • Founded 2023, so there is little long-run payout history
  • Several 1-star reviews cite account breaches for hedging — keep strategies single-account
Why it beats Nova Funding: A named Dubai HQ and a static drawdown on its 2-Step plans, against a brand now pointing at a restaurant.

Try BrightFunded →

What is the best alternative to Nova Funding in 2026?

FTMO is the replacement our own Nova Funding page names, and the reason given there is the right one: it has held the same domain and paid traders for years. If you want payouts you can audit rather than trust, Instant Funding publishes them on-chain.

The lesson from Nova Funding is that the reviews were right and early. A 2.2 average across thousands of reviews, dominated by payout delays, is not noise to be weighed against a marketing page — it is the answer. Check the score, and check it sorted by most recent. See our full best prop firms ranking.

What else should traders ask about Nova Funding alternatives?

Is Nova Funding still operating?

No. It was suspended in 2024 and never resumed. nova-funding.com now redirects to an unrelated hospitality business, and its app subdomain no longer resolves. Checked 12 October 2026.

Why does nova-funding.com show a restaurant?

Because the domain lapsed and somebody else registered it. That is routine when a firm stops paying its bills, and it means the address our old link used is no longer connected to the firm in any way.

What was wrong with Nova Funding?

Trustpilot rates it 2.2 from 4,468 reviews, dominated by payout-delay and support complaints, and our review records that it operated a high-frequency bot challenge-passing scheme.

What is the best Nova Funding alternative?

FTMO, for a decade on one domain with an unbroken payout record. The5ers, Instant Funding, FXIFY and BrightFunded are also covered here.

Can I recover an unpaid Nova Funding payout?

Keep every record of your balance, payout requests and correspondence, and ask your bank about a chargeback if you paid by card. There is no support channel left to escalate to.

How do I spot this before it happens?

Sort reviews by most recent and read the one-star band. Payout-delay complaints that go unanswered are the signal; a high average from years ago is not a defence.

Affiliate disclosure: this page contains affiliate links and top30forexbrokers.com may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Prop-firm evaluations involve simulated capital and carry risk; most participants do not pass. This is information, not investment advice.

🔗 Affiliate Disclosure

This site contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission when you sign up through them, at no extra cost to you. Trading is high risk — most retail traders lose money. Nothing here is investment advice.